Results 1 to 7 of 7

Thread: O.T. MP3 revisited

Hybrid View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #1
    Senior Hostboard Member LICORNE's Avatar
    Join Date
    April 23rd, 2004
    Posts
    1,603
    Follows
    0
    Following
    0
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quoted
    3 Post(s)

    O.T. MP3 revisited

    Hi evryone,

    I read the ?music section in Steve Jobs book. He was aware of the digital compression problem to music. Distortion ,and overtones were not being recorded.

    Today I Tunes are asking the record companies to give them the HD or 24bit 96khz master copies because of their greater dynamic range making a better MP3 sound.

    Unfortunatly FM broadcaster are left to rip in either WAV or MP3. For economic and practical reason MP3 is more often the choice.

    Perhaps the FCC and CRTC should legislate the use of only WAV format Ripping across the US and Canada.

  2. #2
    Senior Hostboard Member
    O.T. MP3 revisited


    Old Guy's Avatar
    Join Date
    June 23rd, 2003
    Posts
    6,359
    Follows
    0
    Following
    0
    Mentioned
    2 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quoted
    62 Post(s)

    Re: O.T. MP3 revisited

    We need less legislation not more.
    Your neighbors called. They like your music.

  3. #3
    Junior Hostboard Member Steve M's Avatar
    Join Date
    December 19th, 2002
    Posts
    16
    Follows
    0
    Following
    0
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quoted
    0 Post(s)

    Re: O.T. MP3 revisited

    Re: FM broadcasters, I thought the "De facto" broadcast standard in past years was MP2 @ 192 kbps? (still a lossy codec). With DAB, I believe the trend has been to re-encode their "music universes/libraries" in wav. However, when you take into account the "brick wall" limiting used in a lot of today's (and over recent years) mastering of CD's, coupled with the on-air muti-band processing of the broadcaster (the loudness wars), dynamic range flys out the window imho. My Altecs certainly show up the short comings of FM broadcasting in my neck of the woods.

  4. #4
    Senior Hostboard Member
    O.T. MP3 revisited


    Old Guy's Avatar
    Join Date
    June 23rd, 2003
    Posts
    6,359
    Follows
    0
    Following
    0
    Mentioned
    2 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quoted
    62 Post(s)

    Re: O.T. MP3 revisited

    Quote Originally Posted by Steve M View Post
    My Altecs certainly show up the short comings of FM broadcasting in my neck of the woods.
    Agreed. The FM in my area makes it sound like Bose. No highs, no lows. No dynamics so you can nap.
    Your neighbors called. They like your music.

  5. #5
    Senior Hostboard Member VolvoHeretic's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 8th, 2011
    Location
    The Exact Center of North America
    Posts
    841
    Follows
    0
    Following
    0
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quoted
    0 Post(s)

    Re: O.T. MP3 revisited

    Quote Originally Posted by Old Guy View Post
    Agreed. The FM in my area makes it sound like Bose. No highs, no lows. No dynamics so you can nap.
    I thought that that was why they invented EQ?
    "James, a little knowledge is a dangerous thing!" World's scariest Volvo: [url]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AKn-LTNa4rc[/url]

  6. #6
    Senior Hostboard Member
    O.T. MP3 revisited


    Old Guy's Avatar
    Join Date
    June 23rd, 2003
    Posts
    6,359
    Follows
    0
    Following
    0
    Mentioned
    2 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quoted
    62 Post(s)

    Re: O.T. MP3 revisited

    Quote Originally Posted by VolvoHeretic View Post
    I thought that that was why they invented EQ?

    Exactly how is eq gonna put back something that isn't there? You don't seem to understand what an EQ can do. It can't fix overly processed music. It can drop a peak or boost a valley. But if it ain't there it ain't there.
    Your neighbors called. They like your music.

  7. #7
    Senior Hostboard Member mah's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 28th, 2008
    Posts
    2,003
    Follows
    0
    Following
    0
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quoted
    1 Post(s)

    Re: O.T. MP3 revisited

    FWIW: A good article on currently encountered recording compression formats.

    https://www.google.com.au/search?sou...g+408&start=20


    Does anyone have information on the dynamic range that a loudspeaker can achieve in a home listening room before room reflections and absorbtions noticeably degrade the sound?
    Last edited by mah; October 5th, 2013 at 09:53 PM.
    Opinion is only as valid as its verifiable supporting evidence.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
This forum has been viewed: 28131802 times.